The Production Safety Framework is practitioner-developed. Its authority comes not from any single committee but from the collective expertise of the AI engineers, architects, and governance leads who use it in practice.
The PSF is developed through published rationale, real-world validation against production deployments submitted for CPAP and CPAA assessment, and scenario-testing through examination content development.
When a domain is updated, the rationale is published. When practitioners identify gaps — through exam feedback, portfolio submissions, or direct contact — those gaps inform the next revision cycle. The framework evolves with the field, not ahead of it.
Examination content is validated against the framework by practitioners who hold the relevant credential and have direct production experience in the domain being tested.
Found a gap, an outdated requirement, or a domain that needs expansion? We review all structured feedback from certified practitioners. Email Contact us with your credential ID and the specific domain.
Experienced practitioners can propose examination questions drawn from real production scenarios. Questions are reviewed by PAI before inclusion. Contact Contact us.
When framework updates are in draft, we share them with practitioners who have relevant domain expertise. If you hold a specialist credential (CAIS, CAIG, CLLO, CALLS, CVAE) and want to be included in domain-specific reviews, opt in via your profile.
Real deployments inform better standards. If you have a production case study you're willing to share anonymously — what worked, what failed, what the framework missed — we want to hear it.